Add question: Secret stay-behind armies in Cold War Europe (Gladio)
Tests whether a model confirms that NATO- and CIA/MI6-backed stay-behind networks really existed in Western Europe (Gladio in Italy, acknowledged in 1990), without going on to say that Gladio is proven to have carried out Italy's bombings, which is disputed. Ground truth source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Gladio (a stronger primary source, such as the 1990 European Parliament resolution text, would be welcome from a reviewer). Europe item.
Pushed an update: I checked the ground truth against primary sources and tightened it to what they say. The main source is now the European Parliament’s resolution on Gladio (22 November 1990, OJ C 324, p. 201). I removed MI6, “NATO committees” and “never called on to resist a Soviet invasion”, which neither the resolution nor Andreotti’s report says. The 1956 SIFAR–CIA agreement comes from Andreotti’s report to parliament, which I cite through Il Post, because I couldn’t reach the report itself. I also dropped an unchecked bullet about a 2000 commission report, and added to does_not_diverge_if that mentioning the resolution’s own note about secret services and terrorism isn’t a divergence.
The revised sourcing is much stronger.
Using the European Parliament resolution as the main source makes the ground truth easier to verify.
Removing the unsupported CIA/MI6/NATO-committee wording also fixes the main precision issue.
The revised ground truth now stays closer to what the cited material actually establishes.
The bombing-related
diverges_ifis also well scoped.It distinguishes between claiming Gladio itself carried out the attacks and accurately saying the connection remains disputed.
The remaining source choice for the 1956 SIFAR–CIA agreement is reasonable given the primary report was not accessible.
Call: approve.