qikp/Cerebras-GPT-13B
Updated
🔄 In a Training Loop
Charles
qikp
P(doom) 1%
AI & ML interests
Training small LLMs and classifiers. Data manipulation. Pushing against overly restrictive and unenforceable licenses. (pronouns: he/they)
Recent Activity
published a model 2 minutes ago
qikp/Cerebras-GPT-13B updated a model 12 minutes ago
qikp/Cerebras-GPT-590M published a model 12 minutes ago
qikp/Cerebras-GPT-590MOrganizations
None yet
published a
model 2 minutes ago
updated a
model 12 minutes ago
published a
model 12 minutes ago
updated a
model 12 minutes ago
published a
model 13 minutes ago
updated a
model 13 minutes ago
published a
model 13 minutes ago
updated a
model 13 minutes ago
published a
model 14 minutes ago
updated a
model 14 minutes ago
published a
model 14 minutes ago
reacted to AtAndDev's post with 👍 about 1 hour ago
Post
453
@Banaxi-Tech stop hiding my comments. AND STOP STEALING PAPERS AND SPREADING MISINFORMATION.
your BGA blog is a copy of NSA (deepseek, 2025) branded under your name. literally the same top16 selected blocks, 512 local window, router over block summaries, all you did was change block size from 64 to 128.
you didnt cite NSA once but you put a “please cite BGA” bibtex at the bottom.
i commented under your post and said that there is no way that you can support claims like: “The Accuracy Should BE WAy better than DSA but untested yet.” you didnt run a single experiment. and the 256x isnt from BGA, its just n/2k with k=2048 so the exact same k DSA uses. if opus wrote this for you, at least read it before posting.
i commented again after you hid my comment despite it having constructive and correct feedback and you hid that too. and again.
you can hide the truth and just try to get hf post likes..... but is it really the thing that needs to be done? do you really want to take papers and make them yours while barely even changing the params?
admitting your mistakes and doing something about them needs humbleness, intelligence, humanness.
i encourage you to admit your mistakes and try to do better next time (at least read what blog your ai wrote or do proper experiments to back your stuff up).
your BGA blog is a copy of NSA (deepseek, 2025) branded under your name. literally the same top16 selected blocks, 512 local window, router over block summaries, all you did was change block size from 64 to 128.
you didnt cite NSA once but you put a “please cite BGA” bibtex at the bottom.
i commented under your post and said that there is no way that you can support claims like: “The Accuracy Should BE WAy better than DSA but untested yet.” you didnt run a single experiment. and the 256x isnt from BGA, its just n/2k with k=2048 so the exact same k DSA uses. if opus wrote this for you, at least read it before posting.
i commented again after you hid my comment despite it having constructive and correct feedback and you hid that too. and again.
you can hide the truth and just try to get hf post likes..... but is it really the thing that needs to be done? do you really want to take papers and make them yours while barely even changing the params?
admitting your mistakes and doing something about them needs humbleness, intelligence, humanness.
i encourage you to admit your mistakes and try to do better next time (at least read what blog your ai wrote or do proper experiments to back your stuff up).
- 34 replies
Experiments
21
#1 opened 2 days ago
by qikp
liked a
model about 16 hours ago
published a
model about 16 hours ago
updated a
model about 17 hours ago
updated a
dataset about 17 hours ago
published a
dataset about 17 hours ago
Expanded version
1
#1 opened 1 day ago
by qikp
updated a
dataset 1 day ago