AI & ML interests

Local LLMs

Recent Activity

MaziyarPanahiย 
posted an update about 8 hours ago
OzTianluย 
posted an update about 16 hours ago
view post
Post
67
zixi-51M: Not a stock voice. A voice. ๐Ÿพ

NoesisLab/zixi-51m
Everyone is shipping 500B-parameter models. I shipped 51 million. With one voice. On purpose. ๐ŸŽค

What: open-weights Chinese TTS. VITS2 lineage. 51.43M params. Runs on your laptop CPU โ€” no cloud, no API key, no GPU bill, no meter running.๐Ÿ’ธ

The voice: not a stock voice, not a 5,000-speaker average. One real human's voice โ€” mine. Timbre, rhythm, breath included. The sample on themodel card is one take, default parameters, recorded by absolutely no one. ๐ŸŽง

What's NOT inside:

โ€ข โŒ BERT (zero. the text encoder vibes on phones + tones alone)
โ€ข โŒ language routing (Chinese-exclusive: 77 symbols, 6 tones, one job)
โ€ข โŒ my training data (the corpus is my own writing and stays mine โ€” open weights, closed corpus, that's the deal ๐Ÿค)

The trick: embedding transplant. Phone, tone and speaker rows inherited from the MeloTTS-Chinese base by symbol name โ€” no random init. Themodel woke up already knowing Chinese. ๐Ÿง 

Built solo, corpus to packaging, by a writer who is also a violinist. Prosody is my day job. ๐ŸŽป

Use it, fork it, fine-tune your own voice. Just don't put words in a real person's mouth. ๐Ÿ™

๐Ÿ”— Weights: NoesisLab/zixi-51m
๐Ÿ’ป Code: https://github.com/lizixi-0x2F/zixi-51M
gianlucamazzaย 
posted an update 2 days ago
view post
Post
4,502
Upstream models my open-source projects run or my articles discuss. Each note says which it is. thenlper/gte-small is real use: RAGFS embeds file chunks with it locally. The two retrieval models from my RAG article, a cross-encoder re-ranker and a bi-encoder, are examples, labelled as such, not claims of production use.
gianlucamazza/models-used-in-my-projects-6aca0b3201f38f4c264ac9bf
gianlucamazzaย 
posted an update 4 days ago
view post
Post
39
I released my own benchmark sets behind emotional-memory, my library for mood-aware recall in LLM agents. The card opens with the limits: the main set is built to favour the method, and the negative results are listed up front, e.g. on LoCoMo AFT scores F1 0.168 against 0.271 for a naive RAG baseline. Use it to check where affect-conditioned retrieval helps and where it doesn't.
gianlucamazza/emotional-memory-benchmarks