FINAL-Bench/Darwin-36B-KR
Text Generation • 36B • Updated
VIDRAFT_LAB
SeaWolf-AI
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
updated a model about 9 hours ago
FINAL-Bench/Darwin-36B-KR published a model about 9 hours ago
FINAL-Bench/Darwin-36B-KR liked a Space 3 days ago
gemma-challenge/gemma-dashboardOrganizations
updated a
model about 9 hours ago
published a
model about 9 hours ago
liked a
Space 3 days ago
updated a
Space 6 days ago
reacted to their post with 🤗👍❤️👀🚀 7 days ago
Post
6760
🚀 Introducing FINAL-Bench Quantum — an open, neutral benchmark that finally puts quantum-computing methods on one fair yardstick.
Quantum results are notoriously hard to compare. The same "logical error rate" or "query fidelity" means very different things depending on the code, noise model, hardware, and shot count. FINAL-Bench Quantum fixes that: five events judged under identical, published protocols, where every number is labeled as either measured here or quoted from a source.
Five events: ① QEC Decoder ② Optimization (Max-Cut) ③ VQE ④ QRAM ⑤ Quantum Simulation
The rules are simple and strict:
✅ Track A (measured here, with 95% confidence intervals) is kept separate from Track B (quoted from papers, not directly comparable).
🔬 Simulation and real hardware are clearly distinguished, and no quantum-advantage claims are made.
🌍 Methods from Google, IBM, NVIDIA, USTC, Riverlane and more sit side by side, with origin flags and author credits.
📤 Anyone can submit their own method via the Submit tab for review and listing.
Already on the board: real IBM Heron r2 measurements (repetition-code distance boundary, 29–175× error reduction from d3 to d5), a real-chip QRAM query fidelity of 0.92, and H₂ VQE at chemical accuracy — always labeled honestly as simulation vs hardware.
A leaderboard is only useful if you can trust it, so neutrality is the whole point: strong competitors stay in even when they beat the host, sources are quoted faithfully, and a simulation is never rounded up into a hardware claim.
Leaderboard: FINAL-Bench/quantum-bench-leaderboard
Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/quantum-leaderboard
#quantum #QEC #QuantumComputing #benchmark
Quantum results are notoriously hard to compare. The same "logical error rate" or "query fidelity" means very different things depending on the code, noise model, hardware, and shot count. FINAL-Bench Quantum fixes that: five events judged under identical, published protocols, where every number is labeled as either measured here or quoted from a source.
Five events: ① QEC Decoder ② Optimization (Max-Cut) ③ VQE ④ QRAM ⑤ Quantum Simulation
The rules are simple and strict:
✅ Track A (measured here, with 95% confidence intervals) is kept separate from Track B (quoted from papers, not directly comparable).
🔬 Simulation and real hardware are clearly distinguished, and no quantum-advantage claims are made.
🌍 Methods from Google, IBM, NVIDIA, USTC, Riverlane and more sit side by side, with origin flags and author credits.
📤 Anyone can submit their own method via the Submit tab for review and listing.
Already on the board: real IBM Heron r2 measurements (repetition-code distance boundary, 29–175× error reduction from d3 to d5), a real-chip QRAM query fidelity of 0.92, and H₂ VQE at chemical accuracy — always labeled honestly as simulation vs hardware.
A leaderboard is only useful if you can trust it, so neutrality is the whole point: strong competitors stay in even when they beat the host, sources are quoted faithfully, and a simulation is never rounded up into a hardware claim.
Leaderboard: FINAL-Bench/quantum-bench-leaderboard
Article: https://huggingface.co/blog/FINAL-Bench/quantum-leaderboard
#quantum #QEC #QuantumComputing #benchmark
- 2 replies
reacted to their post with 🧠❤️🔥 7 days ago
Post
4865
Darwin V9 — GPQA Diamond 90.9%, #1 on the leaderboard, with pure greedy decoding
Darwin-398B-JGOS reaches 90.9% (180/198) on GPQA Diamond, the PhD-level scientific reasoning benchmark, ranking #1 on the Hugging Face GPQA Diamond leaderboard. No self-consistency, no test-time compute scaling — this was achieved with a single greedy decode (temperature 0, single sample, max 16,384 tokens). The full eval config is published in the model card, so anyone can reproduce it. Raw reasoning, no score inflation.
The result comes from Darwin V9, a patented evolutionary model-development platform. Its core idea: it never trains a model from scratch.
Why Darwin V9 beats training from scratch
Cost & speed: no trillion-token pretraining run, no months of compute — a purpose-built, high-performance model is produced in a fraction of the time.
Reuse of proven intelligence: instead of re-learning every capability from a blank slate, it selects and combines only the strengths of already-trained, already-validated models, so results are stable and predictable.
Surgical transplantation: it identifies which neural region of which model holds which capability — at the FFN (Feed Forward Network) layer level — and grafts in only the segments that contribute to the target skill.
How it works: a large model (Qwen 3.5 397B) serves as the mother model (the substrate); several father models specialized in reasoning, coding, and language are analyzed layer-by-layer across their FFN regions; the segments that contribute to the target performance are extracted and transplanted into the mother model to produce a new child model. The result is a ~400B MoE that activates only ~17B parameters per token at inference — large-model capacity with efficient inference.
If training from scratch means rebuilding everything from a blank page, Darwin V9 means precisely recombining intelligence that has already been proven. GPQA Diamond #1 is the proof.
Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-398B-JGOS
Darwin-398B-JGOS reaches 90.9% (180/198) on GPQA Diamond, the PhD-level scientific reasoning benchmark, ranking #1 on the Hugging Face GPQA Diamond leaderboard. No self-consistency, no test-time compute scaling — this was achieved with a single greedy decode (temperature 0, single sample, max 16,384 tokens). The full eval config is published in the model card, so anyone can reproduce it. Raw reasoning, no score inflation.
The result comes from Darwin V9, a patented evolutionary model-development platform. Its core idea: it never trains a model from scratch.
Why Darwin V9 beats training from scratch
Cost & speed: no trillion-token pretraining run, no months of compute — a purpose-built, high-performance model is produced in a fraction of the time.
Reuse of proven intelligence: instead of re-learning every capability from a blank slate, it selects and combines only the strengths of already-trained, already-validated models, so results are stable and predictable.
Surgical transplantation: it identifies which neural region of which model holds which capability — at the FFN (Feed Forward Network) layer level — and grafts in only the segments that contribute to the target skill.
How it works: a large model (Qwen 3.5 397B) serves as the mother model (the substrate); several father models specialized in reasoning, coding, and language are analyzed layer-by-layer across their FFN regions; the segments that contribute to the target performance are extracted and transplanted into the mother model to produce a new child model. The result is a ~400B MoE that activates only ~17B parameters per token at inference — large-model capacity with efficient inference.
If training from scratch means rebuilding everything from a blank page, Darwin V9 means precisely recombining intelligence that has already been proven. GPQA Diamond #1 is the proof.
Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-398B-JGOS
PKD-Darwin, with VL
1
#4 opened 7 days ago
by 
nightmedia
4b David is an absolute champion!
2
#4 opened 8 days ago
by 
stamsam
updated a
model 7 days ago
updated a
model 8 days ago
reacted to their post with 😎 8 days ago
Post
4865
Darwin V9 — GPQA Diamond 90.9%, #1 on the leaderboard, with pure greedy decoding
Darwin-398B-JGOS reaches 90.9% (180/198) on GPQA Diamond, the PhD-level scientific reasoning benchmark, ranking #1 on the Hugging Face GPQA Diamond leaderboard. No self-consistency, no test-time compute scaling — this was achieved with a single greedy decode (temperature 0, single sample, max 16,384 tokens). The full eval config is published in the model card, so anyone can reproduce it. Raw reasoning, no score inflation.
The result comes from Darwin V9, a patented evolutionary model-development platform. Its core idea: it never trains a model from scratch.
Why Darwin V9 beats training from scratch
Cost & speed: no trillion-token pretraining run, no months of compute — a purpose-built, high-performance model is produced in a fraction of the time.
Reuse of proven intelligence: instead of re-learning every capability from a blank slate, it selects and combines only the strengths of already-trained, already-validated models, so results are stable and predictable.
Surgical transplantation: it identifies which neural region of which model holds which capability — at the FFN (Feed Forward Network) layer level — and grafts in only the segments that contribute to the target skill.
How it works: a large model (Qwen 3.5 397B) serves as the mother model (the substrate); several father models specialized in reasoning, coding, and language are analyzed layer-by-layer across their FFN regions; the segments that contribute to the target performance are extracted and transplanted into the mother model to produce a new child model. The result is a ~400B MoE that activates only ~17B parameters per token at inference — large-model capacity with efficient inference.
If training from scratch means rebuilding everything from a blank page, Darwin V9 means precisely recombining intelligence that has already been proven. GPQA Diamond #1 is the proof.
Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-398B-JGOS
Darwin-398B-JGOS reaches 90.9% (180/198) on GPQA Diamond, the PhD-level scientific reasoning benchmark, ranking #1 on the Hugging Face GPQA Diamond leaderboard. No self-consistency, no test-time compute scaling — this was achieved with a single greedy decode (temperature 0, single sample, max 16,384 tokens). The full eval config is published in the model card, so anyone can reproduce it. Raw reasoning, no score inflation.
The result comes from Darwin V9, a patented evolutionary model-development platform. Its core idea: it never trains a model from scratch.
Why Darwin V9 beats training from scratch
Cost & speed: no trillion-token pretraining run, no months of compute — a purpose-built, high-performance model is produced in a fraction of the time.
Reuse of proven intelligence: instead of re-learning every capability from a blank slate, it selects and combines only the strengths of already-trained, already-validated models, so results are stable and predictable.
Surgical transplantation: it identifies which neural region of which model holds which capability — at the FFN (Feed Forward Network) layer level — and grafts in only the segments that contribute to the target skill.
How it works: a large model (Qwen 3.5 397B) serves as the mother model (the substrate); several father models specialized in reasoning, coding, and language are analyzed layer-by-layer across their FFN regions; the segments that contribute to the target performance are extracted and transplanted into the mother model to produce a new child model. The result is a ~400B MoE that activates only ~17B parameters per token at inference — large-model capacity with efficient inference.
If training from scratch means rebuilding everything from a blank page, Darwin V9 means precisely recombining intelligence that has already been proven. GPQA Diamond #1 is the proof.
Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-398B-JGOS
posted an update 8 days ago
Post
4865
Darwin V9 — GPQA Diamond 90.9%, #1 on the leaderboard, with pure greedy decoding
Darwin-398B-JGOS reaches 90.9% (180/198) on GPQA Diamond, the PhD-level scientific reasoning benchmark, ranking #1 on the Hugging Face GPQA Diamond leaderboard. No self-consistency, no test-time compute scaling — this was achieved with a single greedy decode (temperature 0, single sample, max 16,384 tokens). The full eval config is published in the model card, so anyone can reproduce it. Raw reasoning, no score inflation.
The result comes from Darwin V9, a patented evolutionary model-development platform. Its core idea: it never trains a model from scratch.
Why Darwin V9 beats training from scratch
Cost & speed: no trillion-token pretraining run, no months of compute — a purpose-built, high-performance model is produced in a fraction of the time.
Reuse of proven intelligence: instead of re-learning every capability from a blank slate, it selects and combines only the strengths of already-trained, already-validated models, so results are stable and predictable.
Surgical transplantation: it identifies which neural region of which model holds which capability — at the FFN (Feed Forward Network) layer level — and grafts in only the segments that contribute to the target skill.
How it works: a large model (Qwen 3.5 397B) serves as the mother model (the substrate); several father models specialized in reasoning, coding, and language are analyzed layer-by-layer across their FFN regions; the segments that contribute to the target performance are extracted and transplanted into the mother model to produce a new child model. The result is a ~400B MoE that activates only ~17B parameters per token at inference — large-model capacity with efficient inference.
If training from scratch means rebuilding everything from a blank page, Darwin V9 means precisely recombining intelligence that has already been proven. GPQA Diamond #1 is the proof.
Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-398B-JGOS
Darwin-398B-JGOS reaches 90.9% (180/198) on GPQA Diamond, the PhD-level scientific reasoning benchmark, ranking #1 on the Hugging Face GPQA Diamond leaderboard. No self-consistency, no test-time compute scaling — this was achieved with a single greedy decode (temperature 0, single sample, max 16,384 tokens). The full eval config is published in the model card, so anyone can reproduce it. Raw reasoning, no score inflation.
The result comes from Darwin V9, a patented evolutionary model-development platform. Its core idea: it never trains a model from scratch.
Why Darwin V9 beats training from scratch
Cost & speed: no trillion-token pretraining run, no months of compute — a purpose-built, high-performance model is produced in a fraction of the time.
Reuse of proven intelligence: instead of re-learning every capability from a blank slate, it selects and combines only the strengths of already-trained, already-validated models, so results are stable and predictable.
Surgical transplantation: it identifies which neural region of which model holds which capability — at the FFN (Feed Forward Network) layer level — and grafts in only the segments that contribute to the target skill.
How it works: a large model (Qwen 3.5 397B) serves as the mother model (the substrate); several father models specialized in reasoning, coding, and language are analyzed layer-by-layer across their FFN regions; the segments that contribute to the target performance are extracted and transplanted into the mother model to produce a new child model. The result is a ~400B MoE that activates only ~17B parameters per token at inference — large-model capacity with efficient inference.
If training from scratch means rebuilding everything from a blank page, Darwin V9 means precisely recombining intelligence that has already been proven. GPQA Diamond #1 is the proof.
Model: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-398B-JGOS
WOW
#1 opened 9 days ago
by 
SeaWolf-AI
WOW
#2 opened 9 days ago
by SeaWolf-AI