Instructions to use Kodep/jev-topic-head with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- PEFT
How to use Kodep/jev-topic-head with PEFT:
Task type is invalid.
- Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Jev topic classifier — local replacement
📄 Review & open questions live here: https://huggingface.co/spaces/Kodep/jev-review — our read of the spike report, the numbers that matter, and the questions to confirm in the code.
🔒 Data is kept private & separate: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Kodep/jev-topic-data — public code/weights, but the raw item text (school-email-derived) is gated. The
data/folder in this repo is only a pointer.
Replaces the hosted Jev step of the school-email digest pipeline: classify each item into one of 56 topics so the fixed rules table can decide show/hide.
Chosen approach (per the baseline report): Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B + LoRA (rank 16) + a prototype head (56 learned vectors; score = cosine similarity × learned scale), running on CPU — ~0.2 s/item, ~2.2 GiB RAM, 0 GPU.
STATUS: SCAFFOLD. This repo is ready to receive the code, data, and weights from the owner. Nothing owner-side has been pushed yet. The card metadata above is provisional until the real LoRA adapter + head weights land. The numbers in
docs/report_claude_v1.mdare Claude-written and unverified — treat them as claims to confirm against the code and a re-run ofevaluate.py, not as established facts.
Intended layout
jev-topic-head/
├── README.md
├── docs/report_claude_v1.md # baseline claims (Claude-written, unverified)
├── config.yaml # all hyperparameters ← to push
├── data/ # → pointer to private repo Kodep/jev-topic-data (not stored here)
├── src/ # train_head.py, evaluate.py, rules_table.json ← to push
├── checkpoints/ # LoRA adapter + head prototypes (seed 0) ← to push
└── eval/ # per-item test dump + confusion matrix ← to push
Data, the topic taxonomy, and the human ("gold") labels live in the private dataset repo Kodep/jev-topic-data. To pull them for a run (collaborators only): hf download Kodep/jev-topic-data --repo-type dataset --local-dir data.
What unblocks verification (priority order)
src/train_head.py+config.yaml— confirm the actual training matches the report's claims (checklist below).eval/per_item_test.jsonl— recompute top-1 accuracy, macro-F1, and show/hide without re-running the model.checkpoints/+ data (private repo) — reproduce end to end and re-confirm the CPU latency/RAM.
Claims to verify against the code
- LoRA on attention + feed-forward layers, rank 16 / alpha 32 / dropout 0.05; rest frozen
- Head = 56 prototype vectors, score = cosine(item, proto) × learned scale (scale init 20)
- Prototypes initialized from the embedding of each topic description (14 topics have no training item)
- Loss = softmax cross-entropy, label smoothing 0.05, single-label (not multi-label)
- AdamW: LoRA lr 3e-4 (wd 0.01), head lr 2e-3 (no wd); warmup 10% → linear decay to 5%
- Batch 16, ≤ 12 epochs, early stop on validation macro-F1, bf16
- Class-balanced sampling (weight 1/√count), hard topic pairs ×2, no augmentation / no synthetic items
- 3 seeds; macro-F1 spanned 0.49–0.59 across seeds; shipped run = seed 0
- "87.6%" = top-1 topic accuracy vs Jev's fresh answer on test (92/105); macro-F1 0.572; show/hide 95/105 (90.5%)
Headline caveat
All scores are measured against Jev, not ground truth. Jev matches itself only 97.1% of the time and matched a human label 11/20 on one 20-item set. Only 31 items have independent human labels, and the test split was used for decisions (treated as dev data). A fresh, unopened 100-item set is the intended final benchmark.
Reproduction
TBD once src/ lands — will document exact commands (env, base-model path, seed, config) to reproduce train + eval.
- Downloads last month
- -