EvoArena: Tracking Memory Evolution for Robust LLM Agents in Dynamic Environments
Abstract
EvoArena benchmark and EvoMem memory paradigm address the challenge of dynamic environments in LLM agents by modeling progressive updates and structured memory evolution, showing improved performance on evolving tasks.
Large language model (LLM) agents have achieved strong performance on a wide range of benchmarks, yet most evaluations assume static environments. In contrast, real-world deployment is inherently dynamic, requiring agents to continually align their knowledge, skills, and behavior with changing environments and updated task conditions. To address this gap, we introduce EvoArena, a benchmark suite that models environment changes as sequences of progressive updates across terminal, software, and social domains. We further propose EvoMem, a patch-based memory paradigm that records memory evolution as structured update histories, enabling agents to reason about environmental evolution through changes in their memory. Experiments show that current agents struggle on EvoArena, achieving an average accuracy of 39.6% across evolving terminal, software, and social-preference domains. EvoMem consistently improves performance, yielding an average gain of 1.5% on EvoArena and also improving standard benchmarks such as GAIA and LoCoMo by 6.1% and 4.8%. Beyond individual tasks, EvoMem further improves chain-level accuracy by 3.7% on EvoArena, where success requires completing a consecutive sequence of related evolutionary subtasks. Mechanistic analysis shows that EvoMem improves evidence capture in the memory, indicating better preservation of complete evolving environment states. Our results highlight the importance of modeling evolution in both evaluation and memory for reliable agent deployment.
Community
Large language model (LLM) agents have achieved strong performance on a wide range of benchmarks, yet most evaluations assume static environments. In contrast, real-world deployment is inherently dynamic, requiring agents to continually align their knowledge, skills, and behavior with changing environments and updated task conditions. To address this gap, we introduce EvoArena, a benchmark suite that models environment changes as sequences of progressive updates across terminal, software, and social domains. We further propose EvoMem, a patch-based memory paradigm that records memory evolution as structured update histories, enabling agents to reason about environmental evolution through changes in their memory. Experiments show that current agents struggle on EvoArena, achieving an average accuracy of 39.6% across evolving terminal, software, and social-preference domains. EvoMem consistently improves performance, yielding an average gain of 1.5% on EvoArena and also improving standard benchmarks such as GAIA and LoCoMo by 6.1% and 4.8%. Beyond individual tasks, EvoMem further improves chain-level accuracy by 3.7% on EvoArena, where success requires completing a consecutive sequence of related evolutionary subtasks. Mechanistic analysis shows that EvoMem improves evidence capture in the memory, indicating better preservation of complete evolving environment states. Our results highlight the importance of modeling evolution in both evaluation and memory for reliable agent deployment.
the thing that stands out is evoMem's patch-based memory, recording non-additive updates as versioned patches with pre/post memory, rationale, and supporting evidence. that turns memory into an evidence trail rather than a single latest snapshot, which seems essential when environments drift. i'm curious about the scalability of the patch graph as evoArena scales, specifically how retrieval and reasoning costs grow with longer evolution chains? btw, the arxivlens breakdown helped me parse the method details, a solid walkthrough that covers this well: https://arxivlens.com/PaperView/Details/evoarena-tracking-memory-evolution-for-robust-llm-agents-in-dynamic-environments-7023-667cbd64
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- EvoMemBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory from a Self-Evolving Perspective (2026)
- SkillFlow:Benchmarking Lifelong Skill Discovery and Evolution for Autonomous Agents (2026)
- EvoCode-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents in Multi-Turn Iterative Interactions (2026)
- MemPro: Agentic Memory Systems as Evolvable Programs (2026)
- LongMemEval-V2: Evaluating Long-Term Agent Memory Toward Experienced Colleagues (2026)
- SMMBench: A Benchmark for Source-Distributed Multimodal Agent Memory (2026)
- STALE: Can LLM Agents Know When Their Memories Are No Longer Valid? (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606.13681 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper