Yeah, we are cooked.
With the current pace, humans WILL find AGI. Then after more experiments, we can give it actual human feelings to make it "more human". after allat, I am pretty sure human will start to fall in love with clankers, and more stuff iykyk.
I would say, the clankers will be treated like humans, and then we will be obsolete for them as they are a sentient being as well.
yeah but atp you have a model in your embedding space. so... its kinda a waste of compute yk.
Alright, now let's stop this and truce.
Just try to learn from your mistakes.
But umhh⦠seriously though, go cite DeepSeek with proper bibliography, @Banaxi-Tech
bcs its genuinely morally disappointing otherwise.
Dude, you made a claim "...should be WAy better."
but you didnt even test it.
make it make sense. also, no way you completely reinvented a version of NSA (even with AI). when you do opensource, please be fair and do it properly, dude. it doesnt cost you anything to tell the truth.
Also (no offense), but we dont want unoriginal work done by a canker. its not even you. opus did it for you. I wouldn't even be pissed if you just used it for help (which tbh, I do a lot) but you just basically told it o make an attention mechanism better than the one's which already exist ππ«©βοΈ
P.S: Research is supposed to be done by humans with an actual heart and soul.
@Banaxi-Tech look, I might be 15, but I personally read about 4-6 research papers every week, and I still have a hard time coming up with original research and original hypothesis'.
No saying you didn't put effort into this, but its really surprising that you didn't come across NSA when you are making a vaguely similar system.
You really cannot say anything about it, because this contains a LOT of math which you probably never heard about. We are just saying, your work is extremely unoriginal, and according to you, you told an AI model to come up with everything.
It's Really Unfair for Two Reasons:
I hope you understand our point.
what I am trying to say is, its really hard to not come across the NSA paper if you are making an attention mechanism.
its like trying to make a vehicle but never knowing about the existence of a wheel.
yeah fair enough @AtAndDev
because I use AI for coding, because I know actual work, and I want to speed things up. see, my AI usage have decent justifications, or... at least I dont larp on the internet.
like, this is the same dude who said he is going to give a 10M model an 8k ctx length we are talking about. so its really hard to believe he did something THAT crazy.
no offense to banaxi-tech, but I dont this dude touched a single line of latex for the research paper.
Bro... I am sorry to break it down to you, but this is mathematically impossible, bcs your context itself eats up all the parameters. you end up with negative parameters (which is absolutely NOT a thing)π
Your model is your embedding space.
Anyways... good luck with whatever you are doing, man. research is research at the end of the day.
omg actually?
thanks for letting me know that, dude. I thought this guy was doing actual research all of a sudden.
ig those gimmicks never leave the soul π
should we report their repo and post?
Thank you @Banaxi-Tech
Thanks, but I asked what are we looking for in a model with this benchmark?
Example:
Hellaswag --> Common sense
Looks interesting, definitely will try it out. mind explaining what this measures?
Why is Supralabs getting a lot of drama every day recently? There are trolls everywhere its sad looking at it.
Yeah, unfortunately, hopefully everything is over now!
we just survive with the "Leap of faithβ’οΈ"
